i

Our bias, stated plainly: Moat is our app, so we obviously think it's a strong choice. The checklist below is still the honest one — apply it to any authenticator you're considering, including ours. Competitor details reflect publicly documented behaviour as of June 2026 and may change; always check current documentation.

Key takeaways

  • TOTP is an open standard — switching apps never breaks your logins.
  • The deciding question is backup: is it end-to-end encrypted, or can the provider read it?
  • Google Authenticator exports every account as one QR code — moving takes one scan.
  • Keep the old app until you've verified codes match; then retire it.

Why people look for an alternative

The codes themselves aren't the issue — every standards-based authenticator computes the same TOTP codes. The differences live around the codes:

The checklist for any authenticator

Whatever app you land on, it should clear all six:

Moat's answers to all six are documented on the security page — on-device Keychain storage, AES-256-GCM end-to-end encrypted backup, PBKDF2 key derivation per OWASP guidance, zero trackers.

How to switch (about a minute)

i

Switching phones instead of apps? The same export trick is the backbone of moving 2FA to a new device — full walkthrough in our new-phone guide.

The short version

You're not choosing who makes your codes — the open TOTP standard does that. You're choosing who you trust around them. Demand end-to-end encryption, zero-knowledge design, a real export path, and no tracking. If an app can't clearly answer "can you read my secrets?" with architecturally, no — keep looking.